Focus area

Blue-green algae & water quality

A blue-green algae bloom is visible by the time a closure is already due. Sensors in the water and satellite analysis show the increase before it can be seen with the naked eye – time in which a decision to close or to give the all-clear can still be prepared.

The problem

Visible algae or toxicity lead to closures. WAMO readings and satellite proxies produce QC-assessed trends – early enough to act.

01

Blue-green algae usually only become visible once a closure is already necessary.

02

Grab samples show snapshots, not a trend.

03

Closure decisions have to be justifiable to the public and to the supervisory authority.

Market problem

Today, fewer than 0.1 % of all water bodies are monitored in real time.

Current practice: manual sampling every 4–6 weeks during the main season, and in winter usually no monitoring at all. In Hesse, for example, there are hundreds of standing water bodies, of which only 65 are EU bathing waters subject to sporadic grab samples – and 180 gauges in total.

The new pressures: climate change and agriculture generate loading patterns that the sampling frequency of the 1970s can no longer capture. Heavy rainfall washes nutrients into the water. Oxygen-poor sediments release phosphorus. Cyanobacteria produce methane during the day as well – and in oxic layers too.

The consequence: anyone who wants to manage water bodies today needs time series, not grab samples. Early warning, not a diagnosis of the past. After all, sound monitoring is the basis for effective measures – working across whole areas is what produces the knowledge of where and when supporting measures in the water body genuinely help.

Scientific background

Why blue-green algae are more than a bathing problem.

Algal blooms arise from nutrient overload – and can produce toxins that are dangerous to humans and animals. Less visible: water bodies that tip become a climate source. Methane forms as organic material decomposes in oxygen-poor water; cyanobacteria even produce it directly below the surface, in sunlight.

9 % of German water bodies in good condition

According to the data from the third river-basin management cycle, only around nine per cent of surface waters achieve good or high ecological status, or good ecological potential.

German Environment Agency
~20 % of fossil emissions, measured in carbon

Freshwater lakes release an estimated 1.3 to 2.3 Gt of carbon per year – roughly one fifth of what is released worldwide from fossil fuels. Both figures are calculated in carbon.

DelSontro et al. 2018
factor between nutrient-poor and hypertrophic

Between a nutrient-poor and a hypertrophic water body there is roughly a factor of six in greenhouse-gas emissions, carried above all by methane. Reducing nutrient inputs curbs algal blooms and emissions at the same time.

DelSontro et al. 2018

Sources: German Environment Agency (WFD status assessment) · DelSontro et al. 2018 · IPCC

In depth: Monitoring & MRV Journal: How a Lake Tips
The solution

The trend, not the single reading

WAMO measures continuously on site; SWIM delivers area-wide satellite proxies. Together they produce QC-assessed trends that make a decision to close or to give the all-clear defensible.

1

Measure

Continuous readings on site, at short intervals instead of at single points in time.

2

Contextualise

Satellite proxies place the readings in their spatial context.

3

Decide

Justify a closure or an all-clear on the basis of the verified trend.

Short film

The measurement that precedes what is visible.

A good minute without narration. The film shows the station that produces the readings behind this trend.

e.Ray Europa, February 2025The video is only loaded from YouTube when you click. Data is transmitted to Google in the process. Privacy
In practice

20 WAMOs in area monitoring

Mecklenburg Lake District

Regional cooperation · Lake district, MV · since 2024

Area-wide monitoring across many lakes: the same sensors, the same evaluation, one shared data set for everyone involved.

Mecklenburg Lake District
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which parameters does WAMO record?

Temperature, oxygen, pH, conductivity, turbidity, chlorophyll and phycocyanin – simultaneously and continuously. The exact sensor configuration depends on the water body.

Does this replace official sampling?

It complements it: continuous trends between the samples, so that you can act earlier and with evidence.

How quickly do I see an anomaly?

At intervals of 1 to 15 minutes – typically 24 to 72 hours before the point at which algae become visible.

All questions in the FAQ →

Why there is no risk

The safe choice for the public sector.

GDPR & EU hostingData in the EU, no third-country transfers, hosted locally.
Documented & traceableGap-free recording and exports that hold up before councils and supervisory authorities.
Autonomous & resilientSolar operation and resilience node – runs even when networks fail.
Funding-readyStandardised exports and lineage for funding and WFD reporting.
Your next step

See your water body from every perspective.